Tired nurse.

How consecutive workdays affect healthcare services

31 October 2024

The article at a glance

Long periods of consecutive working days in intensive care units negatively affect the quality of care, says research co-authored by Stefan Scholtes.

Stefan Scholtes.
Professor Stefan Scholtes

Healthcare organisations typically follow staffing guidelines based on metrics like staff-to-patient ratios. But at times of high demand, hospitals need to rely on staff working additional consecutive days. What impact does that have on the quality of care? 

Research co-authored by Professor Stefan Scholtes of Cambridge Judge Business School and colleagues from 2 universities in Germany finds that an increase in the average number of consecutive days worked by a nursing team has a negative impact on patient outcomes.  

This is more pronounced when overall staffing levels are low, and the negative effect is amplified for less complex patients because the reduced nursing staff need to tend more to the most vulnerable patients with urgent care needs. 

Why consecutive working days, not only staffing levels, need monitoring 

“Our study focuses on intensive care, and the implications for hospital management is that limiting consecutive working days could significantly improve patient outcomes,” says Stefan, Dennis Gillings Professor of Health Management and Director of the Centre for Health Leadership and Enterprise at Cambridge Judge. 

“We recommend that managers monitor not only daily staffing levels but also consecutive working days. And we urge policymakers to consider imposing limits on the number of consecutive days worked by intensive care nurses. 

“While an all hands on deck strategy might be appropriate in certain hospital settings, our research highlights that a strategy that keeps the nurse-to-patient ratio high at the cost of a nursing team’s higher average number of consecutive working days does not safeguard care quality.” 

The published study was awarded the Wilfried Lorenz Health Services Research Prize 2024 by the German Network for Health Service Research at a conference in Berlin. A 17-member jury cited the study’s high methodological quality and particular relevance for the use of specialist staff in patient care. 

While an ‘all hands on deck’ strategy might be appropriate in certain hospital settings, our research highlights that a strategy that keeps the nurse-to-patient ratio high at the cost of a nursing team’s higher average number of consecutive working days does not safeguard care quality.

Study is based on data from neonatal intensive care units in Germany 

The study, based on data from German neonatal intensive care units, examined the effects of hospital staff working prolonged consecutive working days without breaks. Compared to other safety-critical industries, working time of healthcare employees is underregulated. “To our best knowledge there is no legal limit on the number of consecutive days a nurse can work in the United States. In Germany, the context of our empirical study, nurses, including intensive care nurses, are allowed to work up to 19 consecutive days without a break day,” the research says. 

Professor Scholtes and co-authors focused on 3,447 nurses in 62 neonatal intensive care units (NICU) in hospitals across Germany for 6 months. They collected data and matched units’ actual daily staffing records with clinical data of 847 very-low-birth-weight babies these nursing teams cared for. 

The authors say they chose to study how prolonged consecutive working days affect healthcare service quality in NICUs for 2 reasons: 

1

Long length of stay for neonatal ICU patients

NICU patients have a long length of stay which allowed researchers to observe cumulative effects of consecutive working days at the patient level. .

2

Narrow diagnoses and case mix variation

In contrast to adult intensive care units, the range of diagnoses in NICUs is relatively narrow and case mix variation over time is less pronounced. 

The role nurses play in low-birth-weight babies’ feeding 

The key point for low-birth-weight babies at NICUs is when a patient’s feeding is switched from parenteral nutrition (intravenous) to fully enteral feeding (usually through the mouth, that uses the gastrointestinal tract). This event is an important outcome measure for these patients and is regularly used in medical literature. 

The decision to switch to enteral feeding is heavily influenced by nurses, and a delay in switching increases the risk of severe complications. 

The study thus collected the data from NICUs to analyse the effect “of nursing teams’ consecutive working days on the time from admission to full enteral feeding for 847 low-birth-weight babies, considering nurse-to-patient ratios and patient complexity.” 

The study found that “the team-average number of consecutive working days to 2 days would have reduced the time to full enteral feeding in our study by 6.4%”. Additionally, shifting from “half a day less to half a day more than the average number of consecutive working days has an impact equal to 20% of the difference in time taken to reach full enteral feeding between low- and high-birth-weight babies”. 

Consequences of healthcare exhaustion: stress, headaches and poor decisions

Previous studies have found that increased number of consecutive working days is associated with headache and pain, occupational injuries, chronic fatigue and sleepiness. It also affects people’s psychology as it acts as a stressor. It can impair workers’ cognitive abilities such us memory, attention and decision making.  

Additionally, a rise in the number of consecutive working days can affect the whole team. “Studies have shown that a drop in motivation and attentiveness due to stress can be contagious to other team members, a phenomenon that is also referred to as ‘ripple effect’”, the researchers said. 

Bigger negative impact on teams with low staffing levels 

The medical literature provides evidence that “an increase in short-term (daily) workload does impact patient outcomes, including error rates, readmission, and mortality.”  This can worsen on the days when the staffing levels are low because nurses “might leave care activities undone”, or due to exhaustion they “may not be as capable at rationing their increasingly limited time and deciding which tasks to prioritise”. 

Prolonged periods of more workload will slow workers down and is likely to occur “earlier when nurses are more exhausted at the start of the shift due to a longer period of consecutive working days”. 

Other team members might be able to compensate for this, but if the workload is high they might not be able to support the struggling colleague.  

Balancing care for complex and noncomplex patients

Babies at NICU units will have different needs depending on their maturity at the time of birth. If babies are less mature, they need “longer respiratory and parenteral nutrition periods and have elevated mortality, complication, and infection risks.”  

Complex patients require 1-to-1 nursing care. When staffing levels are low, the team needs to ration nursing capacity. This can be achieved through preserving more nursing time to serve complex patients, or through allocating fresher nurses to complex patients. 

In the first case, there will be fewer staff tending to noncomplex patients. In the second case, noncomplex patients will be left with nurses with high levels of consecutive working days – so in either case there is a more pronounced negative impact on the quality of care for less complex patients.