Biodiversity Finance Conference

event calendar icon

12 May 2024

08:00 -21:00

Open to: Presenting authors, discussants, the scientific committee and invited experts from academia and industry.

event map pin icon

The Royal Society

6-9 Carlton House Terrace

London

SW1Y 5AG

Overview

Biodiversity underpins the health of our world. Its protection impacts all of us. Current estimates indicate the level of investment necessary to maintain biodiversity must increase by $700bn per year. Mobilising sufficient private investment, at scale, is essential to bridging this gap. Global finance has a significant role to play in catalysing change, and innovative research led by financial economists is essential to supporting this role. Yet there are no studies in top tier finance journals that explore the important research questions necessary to tackle this.

Biodiversity and finance.

About the conference

To address this vacuum in published research, the Review of Finance, the Centre for Endowment Asset Management at the University of Cambridge and the Global Sustainability Leadership Institute at the McCombs School of Business launched a global research competition in 2024. The competition invited financial economists to submit project proposals to be considered for publication in the Review of Finance’s Special Issue on Biodiversity and Natural Resource Finance at the end of 2025.

The first stage of this competition took place in October 2024, when the authors of ten successful project proposals were invited to present and discuss their projects with the journal. The second stage takes place at this conference on the 12 May 2025 when these authors will return to present their completed research. The research competition will conclude in November 2025, with an event to celebrate the launch of the journal’s Special Issue.

Learn more about the projects that were shortlisted

Conference agenda

Further information about the order in which research projects will presented will be shared in April.

07:45 – 08:15

Registration and welcome refreshments

08:15 – 08:30

Welcome

08:30 – 09:15

Presentation and discussion of paper 1

09:15 – 10:00

Presentation and discussion of paper 2

10:00 – 10:45

Presentation and discussion of paper 3

10:45 – 11:15

Refreshment break

11:15 – 12:00

Presentation and discussion of paper 4

12:00 – 12:45

Presentation and discussion of paper 5

12:45 – 12:00

Lunch break

13:45 – 14:30

Presentation and discussion of paper 6

14:40 – 15:15

Presentation and discussion of paper 7

15:15 – 16:00

Presentation and discussion of paper 8

16:00 – 16:30

Refreshment break

16:30 – 17:15

Presentation and discussion of paper 9

17:15 – 18:00

Presentation and discussion of paper 10

18:00 – 18:15

Wrap up

18:15 – 19:00

Pre-dinner drinks

19:00 – 21:00

Dinner

Convenors

Elroy Dimson

Professor of Finance and Director of Research at Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, Co-Founder and Chairman of Centre for Endowment Asset Management

Laura Starks

Research Fellow (Finance), Cambridge Judge Business School

George Kozmetsky Centennial University Distinguished Chair at the McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at Austin

Marcin Kacperczyk

Professor of Finance, Imperial College London

  • Patrick Bolton, Professor of Finance and Economics, Imperial College London
  • Elroy Dimson, Professor of Finance, University of Cambridge, and Chairman of Centre for Endowment Asset Management (CEAM)
  • Caroline Flammer, A. Barton Hepburn Professor of Economics, Columbia University, and Director of Sustainable Investing Research Initiative (SIRI), Columbia University
  • Harrison Hong, John R. Eckel, Jr. Professor of Financial Economics, Columbia University
  • Marcin Kacperczyk, Professor of Finance, Imperial College London
  • Laura Starks, George Kozmetsky Centennial University Distinguished Chair, McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at Austin

Sarah Carter

CEAM Executive Director

Sarah Carter is Executive Director of the University of Cambridge’s Centre for Endowment Asset Management, and previously set up and managed the Master of Finance at Cambridge Judge Business School. Before that, she worked for Plan International and for the United Nations Association. She has undertaken PhD coursework and research at the University of Wales, Aberystwyth, and was awarded an MA with distinction in International Studies by Durham University and a BA (Hons) in Psychology by the University of Hertfordshire.

Merve Karakaş

CEAM Centre Manager

Merve is Centre Manager of the University of Cambridge’s Centre for Endowment Asset Management (CEAM). Prior to joining CEAM, she was practicing corporate law in Turkey as an in-house lawyer in Istanbul. Merve holds LLM in Economic Law from Galatasaray University, and LLB from Istanbul University.

Competition timeline

1 May 202415 Aug 20242 Sep 20249 Oct 202431 March 202512 May 2025November 2025
Review of Finance launches call for proposals.Deadline for proposal submission.Successful proposals announced by Scientific Committee.Successful candidates invited to discuss their proposals.Deadline for first draft submission of research papers.Candidates invited to present their findings.Review of Finance Special Issue published.

The shortlisted projects

The call for projects resulted in the shortlisting of 10 research proposals. These were presented to the journal at a research workshop that took place in October 2024. The feedback and collaborative exchange of ideas that took place during this workshop supports the further development of these projects.

Our sincere thanks go to the discussants, whose insightful feedback and expertise enriched the workshop: Franklin Allen, Patrick Bolton, Mariano Massimiliano Croce, Oguzhan Karakas, Philip Krueger, Claudio Rizzi, Jan Starmans, Michela Verardo, Constantine Yannelis, Olivier David Zerbib.

1

Agricultural productivity and local asset values

Peter G. Iliev, Jennifer Liang, and Jess Cornaggia

This project examines the impact of climate change on agricultural productivity and its reflection in the valuation of local agricultural assets. Historical and projected changes in crop yields are increasingly linked to farmland real estate values, though the effect is mitigated by agrodiversity, which allows for crop variety. The research aims to analyse farmland values using granular property-level data and by investigating the impact on local government bonds, particularly in agriculturally dependent economies. These findings could guide policymakers in addressing natural resource management, supporting vulnerable communities, and enhancing global food security.

2

Biodiversity co-benefits in carbon markets? Evidence from voluntary offset projects

Douglas Almond, and Zoey Yiyuan Zhou.

This project investigates the biodiversity ‘co-benefits’ claimed by carbon offset projects, which have been largely unsupported by empirical evidence. It combines data from 10,911 voluntary carbon offset projects with satellite-based ecosystem data and explores whether carbon finance and conservation goals align and whether a disconnect exists between stated biodiversity goals and actual ecological impacts.

3

Biodiversity risk in the cross-section of commodity returns

Massimo Guidolin, and Manuela Pedio.

This project investigates the link between biodiversity risk and commodity prices, addressing an underexplored area in financial economics. It examines whether investors demand a premium for commodities with high biodiversity exposure, as biodiversity loss – driven by deforestation for agricultural and energy production – exacerbates climate change in a reinforcing feedback loop. With emerging regulations targeting ecological preservation, such commodities may face significant transition risks. The study leverages innovative data and controls to isolate biodiversity risk from broader environmental risks, offering new insights into its impact on commodity pricing.

4

Biodiversity ventures

G. Andrew Karolyi, William W. Xiong, Hui Xu, and Sean S. Cao.

The project examines the effectiveness of venture capital financing for emerging biodiversity-focused startups, which differ from large public firms where biodiversity projects are secondary initiatives. It explores tools to improve funding outcomes. Social media is highlighted as a potential tool for overcoming challenges these ventures face, such as limited investor bases and the complexity of nature-related business models. The project uses data from platforms like Twitter, LinkedIn and investment sources like Crunchbase and PitchBook to study how social media can help engage investors and reduce information gaps.

5

Coastal housing markets and climate resilience: financial value of nature-based solutions

Ted Liu, Brook Constantz, Michael Beck, and Galina Hale.

This project quantifies the financial benefits of nature-based solutions to climate adaptation and aims to contribute to existing knowledge on pricing climate risks and identifying cost-effective risk reduction solutions. It focuses on the role that mangroves have on reducing home price declines and price variability following major hurricanes in 2004, 2012, and 2017. The project explores the private financial benefits of mangrove protection and the role of private funding as a key source for financing restoration projects.

6

Corporate nature risk perceptions

Snorre Gjerde, Zacharias Sautner, Alexis Wegerich, and Alexander Wagner.

This project aims to explore how companies perceive and manage nature risks and how they interact with institutional investors on this issue. The survey themes include corporate exposure to nature risks, investor interest in these risks and nature-related disclosures. Distributed through a large asset owner to its portfolio companies, the survey provides early insights into corporate views and actions on emerging nature risks and their alignment with investor perspectives. The findings could assist regulators, investors and academics in shaping policies and models related to nature risks in corporate finance and asset pricing, as well as understanding the impact of investor engagement.

7

Do investors care about the rainforest? Evidence from voluntary carbon offsets around the world

Franklin Allen, Patrick Behr, Riccardo Cosenza, and Eric Nowak.

This project explores how investors respond to firms’ activities in the Voluntary Carbon Market (VCM) using a dataset covering VCM transactions and retirements from 2009 to 2023. Publicly listed firms primarily retire carbon credits linked to rainforest conservation projects, as deforestation is a key driver of climate change and biodiversity loss.

8

Does financing biodiversity reduce biodiversity risk?

Andre Poyser.

This project explores the impact of financing on biodiversity risks, focusing on endangered species, species richness, species protection, and data coverage. Using data from 13,919 biodiversity projects funded by 114 European agencies, the research distinguishes between public and private financing. The project also highlights the potential of biotechnology-focused projects to attract private investment, as these projects may generate future cash flows through ancillary technological applications.

9

Firm-level nature dependence

Arthur Romec, Zacharias Sautner, , Alexander Wagner, and Alexandre Garel.

This project aims to explore firms’ dependence on nature with four key objectives:

  1. develop measures of nature dependence
  2. analyse the factors that contribute to this dependency and how these feature in corporate disclosures
  3. examine the relationship between nature dependence, biodiversity impacts and physical climate risks
  4. investigate the financial market implications, specifically how nature dependence relates to downside risk and stock price reactions when firms face ecosystem shocks.

It analyses over 25,000 firms across 100+ countries between 201 and 2022 and plans to make these measures publicly available.

10

The real effects of biodiversity risk: location-based evidence

Amir Akbari, Man Duy (Marty) Pham, Jing Yu, and Lilian NG.

This project introduces a new Corporate Biodiversity Risk (CBR) measure to assess biodiversity risk and its financial impacts at the organisation/establishment level. CBR evaluates the proximity of corporate production sites to protected areas in the contiguous US to quantify risk. It uses data from 1990 to 2021.

Supporters

We are grateful to the following organisations for the financial support that has enabled us to host this research competition.

Top